Changes Made to Hart-Scott-Rodino Premerger Notification Rules Increase the Reporting Burden on Certain Investors

On July 19, 2011, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (the “DOJ”) issued a Final Rule Publication with respect to a number of revisions (the “Revisions”) to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Premerger Notification Rules (“HSR”).  The Revisions became effective on August 18, 2011.

The FTC and the DOJ adopted the Revisions as part of their continuing efforts to streamline HSR compliance paperwork by eliminating certain reporting requirements.  However, the Revisions also increase the burden on filing entities, especially certain investors such as private equity firms, who acquire other companies through multiple investment vehicles.

The prior HSR rules only required the reporting of information related to the “ultimate parent entity” of the acquiring party and the entities directly or indirectly controlled by the ultimate parent entity.  The Revisions now require the acquiring entity to also report information with respect to its “associates.”  An “associate” includes any person that is under common management with the acquiring entity (not just under common control).  The Revisions provide that associates include “general partners of a limited partnership, other partnerships with the same general partner, other investment funds whose investments are managed by a common entity or under a common investment management agreement, and investment advisers of a fund.”

To give effect to the expansion of the HSR reporting requirements, Item 6(c)(ii) of the HSR form now requires the acquiring entity to identify all of its associates’ investments of five (5%) percent or more (up to fifty (50%) percent) in other companies that either report earnings in the same North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) revenue code or that fall into the same industry category as the acquired company.

The FTC and the DOJ have provided that the reason for including this additional reporting requirement is to allow them to determine whether there are any competition issues raised as a result of an acquiring entity’s associate’s ownership in a company that operates in the same industry as the acquired entity.

This expanded reporting requirement may have a notable impact on certain investors, namely private equity firms and other multiple investment vehicles, who acquire companies through different acquisition entities (including limited partnerships), where all of such entities are under common management (or have the same general partner).  Investors will now have to review all possible NAICS overlaps, increasing the burden on them when reporting under HSR.  While the new reporting requirement may be viewed by some investors as unduly burdensome, in order to alleviate the burden, acquiring investors should try to maintain detailed records with respect to all associates, including the NAICS codes for all associates, so that when they must file an HSR form, the information requested in revised Item 6(c)(ii) is readily available.

 

New York Simplifies Requirements for Powers of Attorney Used in Business and Commercial Matters

On August 13, 2010, New York State laws were amended to clarify that powers of attorney executed by individuals in New York primarily for a business or commercial purpose need not comply with the onerous requirements that went into effect on September 1, 2009. Following the 2009 amendments, the New York General Obligations Laws technically required all powers of attorney executed by individuals within the State of New York (including those used in corporate transactions and securities filings) to comply with mandatory notice, acknowledgement and notarization provisions and certain other technical matters.

The 2010 amendments expressly provide that the requirements for powers of attorney set forth in the 2009 amendments will not apply to:

  1. a power of attorney given primarily for a business or commercial purpose, including without limitation:
    1. a power to the extent it is coupled with an interest in the subject of the power;
    2. a power given to or for the benefit of a creditor in connection with a loan or other credit transaction;
    3. a power given to facilitate the transfer or disposition of one or more specific stocks, bonds or other assets, whether real, personal, tangible or intangible;
  2. a proxy or other delegation to exercise voting rights or management rights with respect to an entity;
  3. a power created on a form prescribed by a government or governmental subdivision, agency or instrumentality for a governmental purpose;
  4. a power authorizing a third party to prepare, execute, deliver, submit and/or file a document or instrument with a government or governmental subdivision, agency or instrumentality or other third party;
  5. a power authorizing a financial institution or employee of a financial institution to take action relating to an account in which the financial institution holds cash, securities, commodities or other financial assets on behalf of the person giving the power;
  6. a power given by an individual who is or is seeking to become a director, officer, shareholder, employee, partner, limited partner, member, unit owner or manager of a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, condominium or other legal or commercial entity in his or her capacity as such;
  7. a power contained in a partnership agreement, limited liability company operating agreement, declaration of trust, declaration of condominium, condominium bylaws, condominium offering plan or other agreement or instrument governing the internal affairs of an entity authorizing a director, officer, shareholder, employee, partner, limited partner, member, unit owner, manager or other person to take lawful action relating to such entity;
  8. a power given to a condominium managing agent to take action in connection with the use, management and operation of a condominium unit;
  9. a power given to a licensed real estate broker to take action in connection with a listing of real property, mortgage loan, lease or management agreement;
  10. a power authorizing acceptance of service of process on behalf of the principal; and
  11. a power created pursuant to authorization provided by a federal or state statute, other than this title, that specifically contemplates creation of the power, including without limitation a power to make health care decisions or decisions involving the disposition of remains.
    The 2010 amendments are effective on September 12, 2010, and will apply retroactively to September 1, 2009.

The 2010 amendments contain other modifications to the New York power of attorney laws which are not all summarized herein.  A copy of the 2010 amendments is available at http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=A08392%09%09&Summary=Y&Text=Y.